There are vertical strategies of tackling public health issues
(disease-focused), and horizontal strategies (more broad and health system-focused). Non-governmental actors commonly take the
vertical approach for several reasons.
Donor wishes or agendas and the measurability of having specific goals
play a large part in this. From a political
economy standpoint, a problem with vertical programs is that they allow
inefficiencies in health systems to persist.
NGOs have become an important branch of development aid, but are not
meant to take over government roles for extended periods. At the same time, how are developing
countries supposed to develop solutions and systems to deal with public health
problems if the problems are taken into the hands of outside influences?
In developing countries where poor health is initiated by
poverty and worsened by the lack of access to care, attempts to improve health
starting from the source are extremely difficult. Poverty reduction and health system construction
take a lot of time, money, and planning.
Those kinds of goals are also more subjectively achieved. More concrete goals, for example, the
eradication of polio, are more concrete and have a greater sense of urgency. Here we get back to the problem with donors
and the agendas that determine public health priorities. Solutions to this aren’t easy, but one idea
is to develop better ways to combine horizontal and vertical approaches in
order to address both immediate and long-term public health problems.
No comments:
Post a Comment